Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294820›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Machine Learning in Predicting Tooth Loss: A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Assessment.

Akira Hasuike, Taito Watanabe, Shin Wakuda, Keisuke Kogure, Ryo Yanagiya, Kevin M Byrd, Shuichi Sato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akira HasuikeDepartment of Periodontology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5150-2076
Taito WatanabeDepartment of Periodontology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Shin WakudaDepartment of Periodontology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Keisuke KogureDepartment of Periodontology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Ryo YanagiyaDepartment of Innovative Medical Science, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.
Kevin M ByrdLab of Oral & Craniofacial Innovation (LOCI), ADA Science & Research Institute, Gaithersburg, MD 20879, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-0524
Shuichi SatoDepartment of Periodontology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22K10042the Dental Research Center, Nihon University School of Dentistry NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting tooth loss is a persistent clinical challenge in the 21st century. While an emerging field in dentistry, computational solutions that employ machine learning are promising for enhancing clinical outcomes, including the chairside prognostication of tooth loss. We aimed to evaluate the risk of bias in prognostic prediction models of tooth loss that use machine learning. To do this, literature was searched in two electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed; Google Scholar) for studies that reported the accuracy or area under the curve (AUC) of prediction models. AUC measures the entire two-dimensional area underneath the entire receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. AUC provides an aggregate measure of performance across all possible classification thresholds. Although both development and validation were included in this review, studies that did not assess the accuracy or validation of boosting models (AdaBoosting, Gradient-boosting decision tree, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) were excluded. Five studies met criteria for inclusion and revealed high accuracy; however, models displayed a high risk of bias. Importantly, patient-level assessments combined with socioeconomic predictors performed better than clinical predictors alone. While there are current limitations, machine-learning-assisted models for tooth loss may enhance prognostication accuracy in combination with clinical and patient metadata in the future.

Indexed as

boostingdeep learningmachine learningperiodontitisprognosistooth loss

Identifiers

PMID36294820
PMCPMC9605501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.