ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
Real-World Analysis of the Aging Effects on Visual Field Reliability Indices in Central 10-2 Tests.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Analysis between Cognitive Function Score and Inner Macular Thickness/Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Microperimetry Characteristics of Regions With a Truly Nonresponding Location: Implications for Atrophic Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Roles of Cognitive Function on Visual Field Reliability Indices among Glaucoma Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Advanced Research in Glaucoma: Treatment and Postoperative Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the influence of aging on the reliability indices of visual field (VF) testing using a large dataset of central 10-2 program tests, including 6674 VF tests, which consisted of 1782 eyes of 1094 Japanese subjects (the mean age ± standard deviation was 66.6 ± 14.1 years). All of the combinations for each parameter, except for the pairs between age and fixation losses (FLs) or false positives (FPs) and between pattern standard deviation (PSD) and FPs, had significant correlations (p < 0.0001). Among the reliability indices, the false negatives (FNs) had the strongest correlation against age (the correlation coefficient was ρ = 0.21). Each reliability index changes differently with aging. The FLs were the highest in the first 10 s and remained constant after 20 s. The FNs remained constant for 60 s and rose steeply after 70 s. The FPs reached their highest value in 10 s and remained constant after 40 s. In mixed-effect regression analyses in 40-year-old or older subjects, older age was significantly associated with higher FNs (p < 0.0001) but not with FLs (p = 0.9014) and FPs (p = 0.9267). Compared to central 30-2 VF testing, central 10-2 VF tests were associated with smaller FLs (p < 0.0001) and FPs (p < 0.0001). In central 10-2 testing, age-related deterioration was seen in FNs but not in FLs and FPs. Choosing the 10-2 program over the 30-2 program can be effective in reducing the FL, especially in older cases with severe VF loss. This study highlighted the relationships between age and each reliability index in central 10-2 VF testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.