Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294533›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Two-Year Healing Success Rates after Endodontic Treatment Using 3D Cleaning Technique: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

Giuseppe Pantaleo, Alessandra Amato, Alfredo Iandolo, Dina Abdellatif, Federica Di Spirito, Mario Caggiano, Massimo Pisano, Andrea Blasi, Roberto Fornara, Massimo Amato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modern Advances in Microendodontics: The State of the Art.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. The Endodontic Space.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giuseppe PantaleoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6161-8590
Alessandra AmatoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-9785
Alfredo IandoloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.
Dina AbdellatifDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alexandria, Alexandria 21531, Egypt.
Federica Di SpiritoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-6559
Mario CaggianoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-7170
Massimo PisanoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.
Andrea BlasiDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-8794
Roberto FornaraIndependent Researcher, 20010 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6841-6534
Massimo AmatoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious irrigation techniques for cleansing the endodontic space have been proposed, and internal heating combined with ultrasonic activation (3D cleaning technique) is considered an effective technique. This prospective multicenter clinical study aims to evaluate healing rates for teeth after root canal treatment utilizing the 3D cleaning technique and to report predictive values for success. MATERIAL AND

methodsNinety patients referred for a root canal treatment were included. All enrolled patients were treated with the 3D cleaning protocol. Four endodontists performed the clinical procedures and follow-up evaluations. Preoperative, postoperative and follow-up data were gathered from the consented patients. Each patient was assessed for any clinical signs or symptoms. Afterwards, two trained, blinded, and independent evaluators scored the subject's periapical radiographs. This score was made by checking for the presence or absence of apical periodontitis using the periapical index (PAI). Then, the teeth were classified as healing or healed and were considered a success based on a cumulative success rate of healing. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher's exact test, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression analyses of the preoperative prognostic factors at a 0.05 significance level.

results90 patients were evaluated at two years with a follow-up rate of 97.7%. The cumulative success rate of healing was 95.4%. Eight predicting aspects were identified by employing bivariate analyses. Then, using logistic analyses, the two prognostic significant variables directly correlated to healing were the preoperative presence of periapical index (

conclusionsIn this two-year clinical study, the cumulative success rate of healing was 95.4% when patients were treated with the 3D cleaning protocol.

Indexed as

3D cleaninghealing rateinternal heatingNaOClroot canal treatmentultrasonic

Identifiers

PMID36294533
PMCPMC9604672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.