ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
A Systematic Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Value of Transabdominal Ultrasound in Patients with Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomogram for malignancy prediction of pancreatic cystic lesions based on trans-abdominal ultrasound features.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Monitoring of low-risk pancreatic cystic lesions with targeted abdominal ultrasound: diagnostic yield, clinical utility, and acceptance.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- The Triage Role of Transabdominal Ultrasonography (TAUS) in the Diagnostic Management of Pancreatic and Distal Biliary Pathologies: A Comparative Efficacy Analysis with Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transabdominal ultrasound for the characterization and follow-up of cystic pancreatic lesions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Agreement in Patients with Pancreatic Cystic Lesions, in Tehran, Iran.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions are a frequent incidental finding in abdominal imaging. Despite its usually benign background, a small fraction exhibiting features suspicious for cancerous development demands continuous follow-up or surgical removal. Current guidelines advocate magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound to evaluate the risk of malignancy, whereas transabdominal ultrasound is perceived as subordinate imaging. The objective of this study was to analyze cyst detection rates of latest-generation ultrasound machines compared to magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endosonographic ultrasound and to determine inter-rater reliability. The results showed that large cysts facilitate their visualization by transabdominal ultrasound while detection rates are independent of the anatomical part of the pancreas in which they were sited. Changes in the pancreatic duct width, a connection to the pancreatic duct system, and the architectural characteristics of cysts are poorly recognized by transabdominal ultrasound compared to magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic ultrasound. Computed tomography imaging is preferred over transabdominal ultrasound to detect calcifications and regional lymphadenopathy. Even if conducted by experienced investigators, transabdominal ultrasound examinations fail to agree with magnetic resonance imaging scans regarding cyst detection rates (κ = 0.093).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.