Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294484›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Evaluation of the Efficacy Duration of Topical Therapies in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Michele Lanza, Angelo Leone, Gabriele Scognamiglio, Luigi Serra, Clemente Maria Iodice, Paolo Melillo, Francesca Simonelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele LanzaDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1578-7155
Angelo LeoneDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Gabriele ScognamiglioDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Luigi SerraDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9484-5060
Clemente Maria IodiceDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Paolo MelilloDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-0293
Francesca SimonelliDipartimento di Specialità Mediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To investigate the efficacy interval of the topical therapies available for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and the ocular and systemic features potentially associated. Methods: This retrospective study included 190 patients with POAG undergoing first topical therapy, throughout a follow-up of 15 years. The patients started one topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering drug within single molecules such betablockers, prostaglandin or dorzolamide, or fixed combinations such as betablockers + prostaglandin, betablockers + dorzolamide, or betablockers + brimonidine. Efficacy duration was measured as the time between the start of the therapy and the change due to IOP increase or visual field worsening. For each patient, ocular and systemic features and comorbidities were analysed to detect any significant correlation with the length of effectiveness of every drug used. Results: The molecules explored showed some discrepancies in terms of mean duration of efficacy; however, no significant differences were demonstrated (p > 0.05). Furthermore, when evaluating the overall cohort, no systemic or ocular features correlated significantly with the effectiveness of the molecules explored. However, the same analysis carried out upon stratifying the different groups according to the IOP-lowering drops they received, demonstrated that the drug efficacy could be influenced by several ocular and systemic features. Conclusion: Data observed in this study suggest that there is no difference in using one of the medications evaluated as first choice of treatment of POAG if the patients are accurately evaluated and the most recent guidelines are adopted.

Indexed as

glaucomamedical therapyopen-angle glaucomatachyphylaxistopical therapy

Identifiers

PMID36294484
PMCPMC9605467
OpenAlexW4306839852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.