Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294448›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Antiproliferative Activity of High-Dose Somatostatin Analogs in Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Francesco Panzuto, Claudio Ricci, Maria Rinzivillo, Ludovica Magi, Matteo Marasco, Giuseppe Lamberti, Riccardo Casadei, Davide Campana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco PanzutoENETS Center of Excellence, Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-4289
Claudio RicciDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Maria RinzivilloENETS Center of Excellence, Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Ludovica MagiENETS Center of Excellence, Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Matteo MarascoENETS Center of Excellence, Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe LambertiAlma Mater Studiorum, Department of Internal Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo CasadeiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Davide CampanaAlma Mater Studiorum, Department of Internal Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-7340
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The antiproliferative activity of a high dose of somatostatin analogs (HD-SSA) in treating gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) remains under debate. Methods: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis were made. The primary endpoint was the efficacy measured as incidence density ratio (IDR) at one year. The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR) and severe adverse events (SAEs). The heterogeneity (I2), when high (>50%), was interpreted by performing a univariate metaregression analysis, analyzing as covariates: type and design of the study, location (Europe or USA), sample size, grading according to 2017 WHO, the metastatic disease rate, previous therapy including surgery, and quality of the study. Results: A total of 11 studies with 783 patients were included. The IDR was 62 new progressions of 100 patients treated with HD-SSA every one year. The heterogeneity was high. The study’s year, type and design, primary tumor, grading, previous treatments, and quality of the studies did not influence the IDR. The IDR was significantly higher in USA centers and studies with more than 50 patients. The IDR was lower when a high rate of metastatic patients was present in the studies. The DCR was 45%. The heterogeneity was high. The DCR was lower in USA studies and in prospective trials. Conclusion: Given the limited efficacy of HD-SSA in preventing the disease progression in unresectable GEP-NENs after failure of standard dose SSA, the use of this therapeutic approach is advisable in selected cases when other antiproliferative treatments are not feasible.

Indexed as

high dose of somatostatin analogsmeta-analysisneuroendocrine neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36294448
PMCPMC9605244
OpenAlexW4306765469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.