ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
The Use of Matriderm
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postauricular Reconstruction With Multiple Dermal Regeneration Templates: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Innovative technique to cover exposed dura mater after occipital osteomyelitis, using our triple layer using matriderm. A case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Pediatric Burns: Biological and Tissue Engineered Skin Substitutes-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Single-Stage Reconstruction of Large Scalp Surgical Defects With Exposed Bone Using Matriderm Flex and Full-Thickness Skin Grafts, a Case Report.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Decellularized Umbilical Cord as a Scaffold to Support Healing of Full-Thickness Wounds.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bioengineering Skin Substitutes for Wound Management-Perspectives and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Single-stage full-depth scalp reconstruction with Matriderm®: a clinical case report and a brief literature review.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2024Article
- Scalp reconstruction with locoregional and free flaps - a retrospective cohort study.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2024Article
- The Central Facial Defect Reconstruction Using a Radial Forearm Free Flap after Malignant Cutaneous Tumor Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Locoregional Flaps for the Reconstruction of Midface Skin Defects: A Collection of Key Surgical Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Dermal Substitutes and Skin Grafts in the Reconstruction of Post-Traumatic Total Scalp Avulsion: A Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe scalp region represent a common area affected by benignant and malignant skin tumor, and it represents a surgical challenge when it is needed to be reconstructed. The aim of this study is to present our experience with full-thickness scalp skin defects, reconstructed using Matriderm
methodsA retrospective analysis of patients treated for scalp region reconstruction was conducted with 16 patients. All patients underwent the same procedure: scalp full-thickness tumor excision with simultaneous reconstruction with Matriderm
resultsThe outcomes obtained were satisfying: wound healing at the end of the procedures was optimal, grafted skin resulted similar to surrounding tissue, and pigmentation and vascularity showed a decrease in the period between 6 months and 1 follow-up.
conclusionsThe use of Matriderm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.