Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294287›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

DASHES Protocol: Development and Feasibility Testing of a Tailored Community Programme to Support People in Recovery from Problematic Alcohol and Drug Use to Cut Down or Stop Smoking Using Co-Creation.

Fiona Dobbie, Martine Miller, Man Hei Marcus Kam, Aoife McKenna, Claire Glen, Alison McCallum

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Smoking Cessation Support in Social and Community Service Organizations: Potential Activities, Barriers, and Facilitators.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fiona DobbieUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-8203
Martine MillerUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
Man Hei Marcus KamUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0385-6915
Aoife McKennaUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
Claire GlenNHS Lothian, Waverley Gate, 2-4 Waterloo Place, Edinburgh EH1 3EG, UK.
Alison McCallumUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8113-2130

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HIPS /21/60
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the continued global decline in adult tobacco prevalence, rates continue to be significantly higher in groups with problematic drug or alcohol use (PDA). It is estimated that people with alcohol, drug or mental health problems account for approximately half of all smoking deaths. In the UK, there are free stop smoking services for the general population. However, these services have been criticized as unsuitable for people in recovery from PDA due to their design, time-limited support, strict requirement for smoking abstinence and lack of consideration of harm reduction approaches. This has led to calls for alternative approaches to support this marginalized and underserved group. This research study seeks to respond to this call by co-creating and feasibility testing a tailored, trauma-informed service specifically for people seeking help for PDA, who are not in immediate crisis, and who may also want to reduce or stop their tobacco smoking.

methodsThe mixed-method study design has two parts. The development study (part one) will use participatory peer research methods to work with the target client group and key stakeholders involved in service delivery, commissioning, and policy to design the service (intervention). The feasibility study (part two) will test the delivery of the intervention protocol and capture data that will enable the assessment of whether progression to a future pilot randomized control trial is merited.

conclusionsThe outcome of this study will be a theoretically informed, co-created intervention with the potential to improve population health by supporting people with problematic drug or alcohol use to cut down or stop tobacco smoking.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFeasibility StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmokingTobacco Smokingaddictiondevelopmentfeasibilityharm reductioninterventionsmoking cessationtobaccotrauma informed

Identifiers

PMID36294287
PMCPMC9603715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.