Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294278›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Navigating Pregnancy and the Healthcare System during COVID-19: A Qualitative Study with Perinatal Women of Color.

Tuyet-Mai H Hoang, Wan-Jung Hsieh, B Andi Lee, Kaylee Marie Lukacena, Karen M Tabb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. New Yorkers Speak Up: Community Perspectives on Improving Healthcare Experiences in New York City.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tuyet-Mai H HoangSchool of Social Work, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7565-4373
Wan-Jung HsiehDepartment of Social Work, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6576-7750
B Andi LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6948-4953
Kaylee Marie LukacenaCenter for Social and Behavioral Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Karen M TabbSchool of Social Work, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4722-9502
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign 637883-191100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo address health disparities in the perinatal period (i.e., during pregnancy and through one year after birth) by exploring the intersectional experiences of perinatal Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color (BIPOC) women during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, participants were asked if and how COVID-19 had impacted their experiences of receiving healthcare, whether they had faced any challenges during this time, how they had navigated these challenges, and what recommendations they had for improving perinatal healthcare.

methodsBetween November 2021 and March 2022 our team conducted eight virtual focus groups comprising perinatal BIPOC women. A semi-structured interview protocol was used, and interviews were voice recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThree major themes common in BIPOC perinatal healthcare experiences during COVID-19 were generated through engaging in reflexive thematic analysis: (1) an overwhelming lack of support from providers, (2) experiences of blame and shame, and (3) difficulties navigating institutional policies that were unclear or ever-changing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations from participants included greater empathic communication from providers in the face of uncertainty during COVID-19, greater access to information and guidance for caring for themselves and their babies, and an overall request for greater compassion while navigating an exciting and busy time. RELEVANCE: These findings have implications for trauma-informed and inclusive perinatal care that can reduce the impacts of systemic inequalities for perinatal BIPOC women. This study offers a discussion of implications for future training for maternal health providers and implications for community-based programs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare DisparitiesMaternal Health ServicesBlack or African AmericanDelivery of Health CareEthnic and Racial MinoritiesFemaleHealth InequitiesHumansIndigenous PeoplesPandemicsParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchCOVID-19healthcare servicesintersectionalityperinatalWomen of Color

Identifiers

PMID36294278
PMCPMC9602964
OpenAlexW4307555826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.