ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Experimental Comparison of Biofidel Measuring Devices Used for the Validation of Collaborative Robotics Applications.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Design, Validation, and Metrological Limits of Biofidelic Instrumentation in PFL Collaborative Robotics: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Trends and Future Paradigms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- A comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis on collaborative robotics for industry: safety emerging as a core focus.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- A Variable Stiffness System for Impact Analysis in Collaborative Robotics Applications with FPGA-Based Force and Pressure Data Acquisition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biofidel measuring devices are used to validate safety in collaborative workplaces. In these workplaces, humans work together with robots that are equipped with a Power and Force Limiting function (PFL). In this experimental comparison, differences between devices and possible causes are examined more closely. Safety-related parameters are identified in a literature review. Focusing on mechanical aspects, three biofidel measuring devices are analysed and compared in an experimental test series. To this end, a linear motor and a pendulum are used and the steps for comparing concepts are proposed and applied. Depending on the stiffness settings and the materials used, geometry effects on the force-deformation behaviour are shown. An oscillation occurred in one case. The comparison of the three devices shows average differences of 5% in measured peak force between them. This study helps to achieve uniform and comparable results in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.