Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294131›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Stakeholders' Perceptions Regarding Adaptation and Implementation of Existing Individual and Environmental Workplace Health Promotion Interventions in Blue-Collar Work Settings.

Hanne C S Sponselee, Lies Ter Beek, Carry M Renders, Suzan J W Robroek, Ingrid H M Steenhuis, Willemieke Kroeze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanne C S SponseleeDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-4953
Lies Ter BeekDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carry M RendersDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzan J W RobroekDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-9676
Ingrid H M SteenhuisDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willemieke KroezeDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 50-53115-98-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blue-collar workers often have disadvantageous health statuses and might therefore benefit from a combination of individual and environmental workplace health promotion interventions. Exploring stakeholders' perceived facilitators and barriers regarding the combined implementation of these interventions in blue-collar work settings is important for effective implementation. A qualitative study consisting of 20 stakeholder interviews within six types of organisations in The Netherlands was conducted. The potential implementation of the evidence-based individual intervention SMARTsize and the environmental intervention company cafeteria 2.0 was discussed. Data were analysed using thematic analysis with a deductive approach. Five main themes emerged: (1) the availability of resources, (2) professional obligation, (3) expected employee cooperation, (4) the compatibility of the proposed health interventions, and (5) the content of implementation tools and procedures. Generally, stakeholders expressed a sense of professional obligation toward workplace health promotion, mentioning that the current societal focus on health and lifestyle provided the perfect opportunity to implement interventions to promote healthy eating and physical activity. However, they often perceived the high doses of employees' occupational physical activity as a barrier. We recommend co-creating interventions, implementation tools, and processes by involving stakeholders with different professional backgrounds and by adapting communication strategies at diverse organisational levels.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWorkplaceDiet, HealthyHealth PromotionHumansQualitative Researchblue-collarimplementationlifestyleMIDIoccupational healthperceptionspreventionworkplace health promotion interventions

Identifiers

PMID36294131
PMCPMC9603088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.