Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36294029›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Microplastic Contamination of Chicken Meat and Fish through Plastic Cutting Boards.

Rana Zeeshan Habib, Ruwaya Al Kindi, Feras Al Salem, Wajeeh Faris Kittaneh, Vijo Poulose, Syed Haris Iftikhar, Abdel-Hamid Ismail Mourad, Thies Thiemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Food: Dietary Toxicology Beyond Particle Counts.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Microplastics-AssistedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Impact of Microplastics on the Ocular Surface.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rana Zeeshan HabibDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Ruwaya Al KindiDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Feras Al SalemDepartment of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Wajeeh Faris KittanehDepartment of Geology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-7219
Vijo PouloseDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-8105-2990
Syed Haris IftikharDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Abdel-Hamid Ismail MouradDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-8356-0542
Thies ThiemannDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-7082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastic contamination was found in fish and chicken bought on the market, in food stores and in chain supermarkets in the Middle East with the contamination ranging from 0.03 ± 0.04 to 1.19 ± 0.72 particles per gram of meat in chicken and from 0.014 ± 0.024 to 2.6 ± 2.8 particles per gram in fish. Only one fish was found to be free of microplastic. The source of the microplastic was established to be the polythene-based plastic cutting board the food was cut on. More microplastic contamination was found in food cut from the bone than in cut fillets when the fillets themselves were prepared on surfaces other than plastic. Washing the fish and chicken before food preparation decreased but did not completely remove the microplastic contamination. The fate of the microplastic in grilled fish was studied. The mechanical properties of typical plastic cutting boards commercially used in the markets were investigated in the form of tensile, hardness, and wear tests. Overall, the plastic cutting boards showed similar wear rates.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsChickensEnvironmental MonitoringFishesFood HandlingFood MicrobiologyMeatPlasticsPolyethyleneMicroplasticsPlasticsPolyethyleneWater Pollutants, Chemicalfood contaminationfood preparationmicroplasticsplastic cutting boardswastewater

Identifiers

PMID36294029
PMCPMC9602623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.