ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
Checklist: A Useful and Safe Tool for the Initiation of Care for Eutocical Vaginal Delivery.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Workshop for Basic Gynaecological Examinations: Improving Medical Student Learning through Clinical Simulation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study is to present and analyze the vaginal delivery checklist as a safe and useful learning tool for first-year residents in the gynecology and obstetrics and midwifery specialties at different hospitals and to analyze the items that comprise it and the progress of the residents during the first 30 normal deliveries attended in a supervised manner. We present a descriptive, observational and prospective study in which 18 participants from different hospitals in Spain completed a checklist of skills in the first 30 births attended autonomously after learning its use in a simulation workshop. We collected a total of 329 of 330 checklists completed by 11 participants. In addition, the mean responses for each item contained on the checklist and the mean global progression of the participants were subsequently analyzed, detecting statistically significant differences using Student's t-test for paired data. During the data collection period between September 2020 and August 2021, a total of 329 checklists were analyzed. The global average of positive responses for the 30 questions contained on the checklist was 25.36 out of 30 points. The fulfillment of the different items was variable, with the lowest fulfillment of 2.18 points, although 73% of the items obtained a score greater than 25. A statistically significant difference in the mean compliance of the first five childbirths compared to the last five deliveries using the proposed checklist was obtained, with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.