Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293885›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

What's behind the Dashboard? Intervention Mapping of a Mobility Outcomes Monitoring System for Rehabilitation.

Claudine Auger, Cassioppée Guay, Alex Pysklywec, Nathalie Bier, Louise Demers, William C Miller, Dominique Gélinas-Bronsard, Sara Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Claudine AugerFaculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Cassioppée GuayFaculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Alex PysklywecFaculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Nathalie BierFaculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Louise DemersFaculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
William C MillerDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Dominique Gélinas-BronsardFaculty of Medicine, School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.
Sara AhmedCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montréal, QC H3S 1M9, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CACentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

AGEWELL NCE AWCAT-2019-129AGEWELL NCE CRP 2015-WP2.2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Training and follow-up for older adults who received new assistive technology can improve device use adoption and function, but there is a lack of systematic and coordinated services. To address this gap, the Internet-based MOvIT+™ was designed to provide remote monitoring and support for assistive technology users and their caregivers. This paper presents the intervention mapping approach that was used. In step 1, we established a project governance structure and a logic model emerged from interviews with stakeholders and a systematic review of literature. In step 2, a modified TRIAGE consensus process led to the prioritization of thirty-six intervention components. In step 3, we created use cases for all intervention end users. In step 4, the intervention interface was created through iterative lab testing, and we gathered training resources. In step 5, a two-stage implementation plan was devised with the recruited rehabilitation sites. In step 6, we proposed an evaluation protocol. This detailed account of the development of MOvIT+™ demonstrates how the combined use of an intervention mapping approach and participatory processes with end users can help linking evidence-based, user-centered, and pragmatic reasoning. It makes visible the complexities behind the development of Internet-based interventions, while guiding future program developers.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionMedicineSelf-Help DevicesAgedCaregiversHumansinternet-based interventionsintervention mappingremote assistanceremote monitoringself-management devices

Identifiers

PMID36293885
PMCPMC9602496
OpenAlexW4306381992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.