Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293876›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Multi-Phase Environmental Impact Assessment of Marine Ecological Restoration Project Based on DPSIR-Cloud Model.

Junwu Wang, Yipeng Liu, Mingyang Liu, Suikuan Wang, Jiaji Zhang, Han Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evaluation of Enterprise Green Mine Construction Based on DPSIR Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junwu WangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7311-8400
Yipeng LiuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5478-0159
Mingyang LiuChina Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430040, China.
Suikuan WangChina Construction Third Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430040, China.
Jiaji ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Han WuSchool of Engineering and Construction, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China.

Funding

Hainan Special PhD Scientific Research Foundation of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City HSPHDSRF-2022-03-006National Key R&D projects 2018YFC0704301Science and Technology Project of Wuhan Urban and Rural Construction Bureau, China 201943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to achieve a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental impact of ecological restoration projects (ERP) under the current destruction and restoration of coastal ecological areas, this paper takes into account the impact of positive and negative indicators on the environment; analyzes the positive and negative benefits of ERP; and establishes a comprehensive environmental impact index system for marine ERP from ecological, economic, and social perspectives through the DPSIR model. On this basis, the cloud model and Monte Carlo simulation are used to obtain the comprehensive assessment grade of the construction period, short-term operation, and long-term operation in the project life cycle. The results show that the benefits of ERP, considering the impact of negative factors, are significantly reduced, and the benefits of ERP will increase remarkably in the long-term operation period. In engineering practice, the environmental pressure factor caused by excessive human activities during construction and operation periods is a key negative factor affecting the overall benefits of ERP. For project decision makers and other stakeholders, the comprehensive assessment grade considering negative impacts is more practical. At the same time, decision makers should take active response measures in the framework of long-term sustainable development, set a tolerance threshold for negative pressure indicators, and strengthen the management of ERP.

Indexed as

EnvironmentHuman ActivitiesConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHumansMarine Biologycloud modelDPSIRecological restoration project (ERP)Monte Carlo simulationmulti-phase environmental impact assessment

Identifiers

PMID36293876
PMCPMC9603110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.