Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293828›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Revealing Public Opinion towards the COVID-19 Vaccine with Weibo Data in China: BertFDA-Based Model.

Jianping Zhu, Futian Weng, Muni Zhuang, Xin Lu, Xu Tan, Songjie Lin, Ruoyi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Examining the Intermedia Agenda Setting Effects amid the Changsheng Vaccine Crisis: A Computational Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jianping ZhuNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Futian WengNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7982-8729
Muni ZhuangNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Xin LuCollege of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-6493
Xu TanCareer-Oriented Multidisciplinary Education Center, Shenzhen Institiute of Information Technology, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Songjie LinCareer-Oriented Multidisciplinary Education Center, Shenzhen Institiute of Information Technology, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Ruoyi ZhangColumbia College of Art and Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

Funding

Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation 20Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation ZD137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented burdens on people's health and subjective well-being. While countries around the world have established models to track and predict the affective states of COVID-19, identifying the topics of public discussion and sentiment evolution of the vaccine, particularly the differences in topics of concern between vaccine-support and vaccine-hesitant groups, remains scarce. Using social media data from the two years following the outbreak of COVID-19 (23 January 2020 to 23 January 2022), coupled with state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) techniques, we developed a public opinion analysis framework (BertFDA). First, using dynamic topic clustering on Weibo through the latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model, a total of 118 topics were generated in 24 months using 2,211,806 microblog posts. Second, by building an improved Bert pre-training model for sentiment classification, we provide evidence that public negative sentiment continued to decline in the early stages of COVID-19 vaccination. Third, by modeling and analyzing the microblog posts from the vaccine-support group and the vaccine-hesitant group, we discover that the vaccine-support group was more concerned about vaccine effectiveness and the reporting of news, reflecting greater group cohesion, whereas the vaccine-hesitant group was particularly concerned about the spread of coronavirus variants and vaccine side effects. Finally, we deployed different machine learning models to predict public opinion. Moreover, functional data analysis (FDA) is developed to build the functional sentiment curve, which can effectively capture the dynamic changes with the explicit function. This study can aid governments in developing effective interventions and education campaigns to boost vaccination rates.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsPublic OpinionCOVID-19 VaccinesBertCOVID-19 vaccinefunctional data analysissentiment analysistopic model

Identifiers

PMID36293828
PMCPMC9602858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.