Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293758›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes of Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Data Collected before the LACC Trial.

Basilio Pecorino, Maria Gabriella D'Agate, Giuseppe Scibilia, Paolo Scollo, Andrea Giannini, Mariano Catello Di Donna, Vito Chiantera, Antonio Simone Laganà

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Basilio PecorinoMaternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna "Kore", 95126 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-4193
Maria Gabriella D'AgateMaternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna "Kore", 95126 Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe ScibiliaObstetrics and Gynecology, "Giovanni Paolo II" Hospital, 97100 Ragusa, Italy.
Paolo ScolloMaternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Enna "Kore", 95126 Catania, Italy.
Andrea GianniniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, PhD Course in "Translational Medicine and Oncology", Sapienza University, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-0082
Mariano Catello Di DonnaUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Vito ChianteraUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonio Simone LaganàUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1543-2802
Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a surgical approach is one of the key treatments for stages IA1-IIA2, results of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) published in 2018 radically changed the field, since minimally invasive surgery was associated with a four-fold higher rate of recurrence and a six-fold higher rate of all-cause death compared to an open approach. We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) and total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) for cervical cancer, including data collected before the LACC trial. In our retrospective analysis, operative time was significantly longer in TLRH compared to ARH (

Indexed as

LaparoscopyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeabdominal radical hysterectomycervical cancerminimally invasive surgerysurgical outcomestotal laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID36293758
PMCPMC9603513
OpenAlexW4306152123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.