Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293654›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Unveiling Urinary Mutagenicity by the Ames Test for Occupational Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Bela Barros, Marta Oliveira, Simone Morais

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bela BarrosREQUIMTE-LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1779-7688
Marta OliveiraREQUIMTE-LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4150-0151
Simone MoraisREQUIMTE-LAQV, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 431, 4249-015 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6433-5801
Rede de Química e Tecnologia · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PCIF/SSO/0090/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50006/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational exposure may involve a variety of toxic compounds. A mutagenicity analysis using the Ames test can provide valuable information regarding the toxicity of absorbed xenobiotics. Through a search of relevant databases, this systematic review gathers and critically discusses the published papers (excluding other types of publications) from 2001-2021 that have assessed urinary mutagenicity (Ames test with

Indexed as

CokePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsCharcoalColoring AgentsHistidineHumansMutagenicity TestsMutagensSmokeVehicle EmissionsCharcoalCokeColoring AgentsHistidineMutagensPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSmokeVehicle Emissionsmutagenicityoccupational healthtoxic exposureurinary biomarker

Identifiers

PMID36293654
PMCPMC9603210
OpenAlexW4304588297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.