Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293629›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Co-Creation and Co-Production of Health Promoting Activities Addressing Older People-A Scoping Review.

Anne Seneca Terkelsen, Christian Tolstrup Wester, Gabriel Gulis, Jørgen Jespersen, Pernille Tanggaard Andersen

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advancing a collective vision for equity-based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne Seneca TerkelsenUnit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6705 Esbjerg Ø., Denmark.
Christian Tolstrup WesterUnit for Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Biodemography, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7477-1401
Gabriel GulisUnit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6705 Esbjerg Ø., Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8174-4591
Jørgen JespersenUnit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6705 Esbjerg Ø., Denmark.
Pernille Tanggaard AndersenUnit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 6705 Esbjerg Ø., Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7334-761X
University of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

the University of Southern Denmark, the municipality of Esbjerg, Denmark, and the Alice and Tage Soerensen Foundation, Denmark. 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global population is aging and the promotion of health and well-being for this generation is essential. Co-creative and co-productive practices can be solutions to welfare challenges in local policies. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the co-creation and co-production of health-promoting activities addressing older people aged 60+ years and to examine the influence of co-creative and co-productive activities on health and well-being, including influential factors for co-creation and co-production. We searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature in ten scientific and five non-scientific databases. From the 2648 studies retrieved, 18 articles were included in this review. Then, an inductive thematic content analysis was applied to the analysis. Three categories related to co-creative and co-productive activities emerged: "Social and physical activities", "Development of age-friendly environments", and "Discussions of healthy and active aging". Facilitating factors for co-creation and co-production were related to the planning and structure of the process and recognition of participants' time and resources, while the recruitment of participants and their time and resources were the main barriers. Future studies should target co-creative and co-productive interventions to concrete areas and specific sub-groups and be aware of factors influencing a co-creative or co-productive relationship with older people.

Indexed as

AgingHealth StatusAgedEfficiencyExerciseHealth PromotionHumansco-creationco-productionhealth promotionolder people

Identifiers

PMID36293629
PMCPMC9602529
OpenAlexW4304588348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.