Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293594›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Application of a Decision Tree Model to Predict the Outcome of Non-Intensive Inpatients Hospitalized for COVID-19.

Massimo Giotta, Paolo Trerotoli, Vincenzo Ostilio Palmieri, Francesca Passerini, Piero Portincasa, Ilaria Dargenio, Jihad Mokhtari, Maria Teresa Montagna, Danila De Vito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Massimo GiottaSchool of Specialization in Medical Statistics and Biometry, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7041-7851
Paolo TrerotoliDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7102-9108
Vincenzo Ostilio PalmieriDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Francesca PasseriniDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Piero PortincasaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-1471
Ilaria DargenioSchool of Specialization in Medical Statistics and Biometry, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7175-2985
Jihad MokhtariDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Medical School, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Maria Teresa MontagnaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2958-5458
Danila De VitoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences, and Sense Organs, Medical School, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4816-4456
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have identified predictors of outcomes for inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in intensive care units. However, most retrospective studies applied regression methods to evaluate the risk of death or worsening health. Recently, new studies have based their conclusions on retrospective studies by applying machine learning methods. This study applied a machine learning method based on decision tree methods to define predictors of outcomes in an internal medicine unit with a prospective study design. The main result was that the first variable to evaluate prediction was the international normalized ratio, a measure related to prothrombin time, followed by immunoglobulin M response. The model allowed the threshold determination for each continuous blood or haematological parameter and drew a path toward the outcome. The model's performance (accuracy, 75.93%; sensitivity, 99.61%; and specificity, 23.43%) was validated with a k-fold repeated cross-validation. The results suggest that a machine learning approach could help clinicians to obtain information that could be useful as an alert for disease progression in patients with COVID-19. Further research should explore the acceptability of these results to physicians in current practice and analyze the impact of machine learning-guided decisions on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Decision TreesHumansImmunoglobulin MInpatientsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesImmunoglobulin Mclinical aspectCOVID-19haematochemical parametersmachine learningpredictionprognostic markers

Identifiers

PMID36293594
PMCPMC9602523
OpenAlexW4304585354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.