Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293580›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Self-Reported Experiences of Midwives Working in the UK across Three Phases during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Susan McGrory, Ruth D Neill, Patricia Gillen, Paula McFadden, Jill Manthorpe, Jermaine Ravalier, John Mallett, Heike Schroder, Denise Currie, John Moriarty and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Susan McGrorySchool of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Magee Campus, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-3746
Ruth D NeillSchool of Medicine, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-4213
Patricia GillenSchool of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Belfast Campus, Ulster University, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK.
Paula McFaddenSchool of Applied Social Policy Sciences, Magee Campus, Ulster University, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6025-5107
Jill ManthorpeNIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, 22 Kingsway, Holborn, London WC2B 6LE, UK.
Jermaine RavalierSchool of Science, Bath Spa University, Newton Park, Newton St Loe, Bath BA2 9BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-4841
John MallettSchool of Psychology, Coleraine Campus, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-3329
Heike SchroderQueen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast, 185 Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5EE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-7954
Denise CurrieQueen's Management School, Queen's University Belfast, 185 Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT9 5EE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-0407
John MoriartySchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 69-71 University Street, Belfast BT7 1HL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8280-973X
Patricia NichollSchool of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 69-71 University Street, Belfast BT7 1HL, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research NIHRPR-PRU-1217-21002Public Health Agency COM/5603/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternity services cannot be postponed due to the nature of this service, however, the pandemic resulted in wide-ranging and significant changes to working practices and services. This paper aims to describe UK midwives' experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study forms part of a larger multiple phase research project using a cross-sectional design based on an online survey. The online survey used validated psychometric tools to measure work-related quality of life, wellbeing, coping, and burnout as well as open-ended questions to further understand the experiences of staff working during the pandemic. This paper reports the qualitative data collected from the open-ended questions. The qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis and the four main themes that emerged were 'relentless stress/pressure', 'reconfiguration of services', 'protection of self and others', and 'workforce challenges'. The key conclusions were that midwives experienced a reduction in quality of working life and significant stress throughout the pandemic due to a range of factors including staffing shortages, restrictions placed on women's partners, changes to services and management support, all of which compounded workforce pressures that existed prior to the pandemic. This research recommends consultation of front-line midwives in relation to possible changes in practice and workforce planning in preparation for crises such as a pandemic and to ensure equitable and supportive management with access to practical and psychological support.

Indexed as

COVID-19MidwiferyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSelf ReportUnited KingdomburnoutCOVID-19maternity caremidwiferystressworkplace

Identifiers

PMID36293580
PMCPMC9603051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.