Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293316›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Estimating the Similarity between Protein Pockets.

Merveille Eguida, Didier Rognan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Eigenvalue Ratios Reveal Shared Binding Pocket Shapes in RNA and Protein Structures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  7. Multi-Component Synthesis of New Fluorinated-Pyrrolo[3,4-International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Databases of ligand-binding pockets and protein-ligand interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merveille EguidaLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200 CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 67400 Illkirch, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0976-0239
Didier RognanLaboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique, UMR7200 CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 67400 Illkirch, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0577-641X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the exponential increase in publicly available protein structures, the comparison of protein binding sites naturally emerged as a scientific topic to explain observations or generate hypotheses for ligand design, notably to predict ligand selectivity for on- and off-targets, explain polypharmacology, and design target-focused libraries. The current review summarizes the state-of-the-art computational methods applied to pocket detection and comparison as well as structural druggability estimates. The major strengths and weaknesses of current pocket descriptors, alignment methods, and similarity search algorithms are presented. Lastly, an exhaustive survey of both retrospective and prospective applications in diverse medicinal chemistry scenarios illustrates the capability of the existing methods and the hurdle that still needs to be overcome for more accurate predictions.

Indexed as

Drug DesignProteinsAlgorithmsBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationRetrospective StudiesLigandsProteinsalignmentartificial intelligence drug designbinding sitelibrary designmachine learningoff-targetvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID36293316
PMCPMC9604425
OpenAlexW4306742781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.