Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293227›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Ella versus Simoa Serum Neurofilament Assessment to Monitor Treatment Response in Highly Active Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Martin Nötzel, Luise Ina Werder, Tjalf Ziemssen, Katja Akgün

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin NötzelDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Luise Ina WerderDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Tjalf ZiemssenDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-8202
Katja AkgünDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1371-5032
Technische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) is of growing importance in the field of neurology. In the management of multiple sclerosis, it can serve as a useful marker to assess disease activity and treatment response. This paper compares two available methods, namely the Single Molecule Array (Simoa) and the Ella microfluid platform, to measure longitudinal sNfL levels of 42 highly active multiple sclerosis patients treated with alemtuzumab over a period of 36 months. In order to assess the methods agreement, Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok regression were analyzed. Here, we show that despite the fact that Ella measures around 24% higher values than Simoa, both are equally suitable for longitudinal sNfL monitoring.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisAlemtuzumabBiomarkersHumansIntermediate FilamentsMonitoring, PhysiologicNeurofilament ProteinsAlemtuzumabBiomarkersNeurofilament ProteinsalemtuzumabEllamethod comparisonneurofilamentSimoa

Identifiers

PMID36293227
PMCPMC9604350
OpenAlexW4306385747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.