Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293212›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Phosphorylated Proteins from Serum: A Promising Potential Diagnostic Biomarker of Cancer.

Rishila Ghosh, Rakin Ahmed, Hafiz Ahmed, Bishnu P Chatterjee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rishila GhoshDepartment of Oncogene Regulation, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata 700026, India.
Rakin AhmedGlycoMantra Inc., Biotechnology Center, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21227, USA.
Hafiz AhmedGlycoMantra Inc., Biotechnology Center, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21227, USA.
Bishnu P ChatterjeeDepartment of Oncogene Regulation, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata 700026, India.
Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute · INUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

NIH HHS DK125126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a fatal disease worldwide. Each year ten million people are diagnosed around the world, and more than half of patients eventually die from it in many countries. A majority of cancer remains asymptomatic in the earlier stages, with specific symptoms appearing in the advanced stages when the chances of adequate treatment are low. Cancer screening is generally executed by different imaging techniques like ultrasonography (USG), mammography, CT-scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging techniques, however, fail to distinguish between cancerous and non-cancerous cells for early diagnosis. To confirm the imaging result, solid and liquid biopsies are done which have certain limitations such as invasive (in case of solid biopsy) or missed early diagnosis due to extremely low concentrations of circulating tumor DNA (in case of liquid biopsy). Therefore, it is essential to detect certain biomarkers by a noninvasive approach. One approach is a proteomic or glycoproteomic study which mostly identifies proteins and glycoproteins present in tissues and serum. Some of these studies are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Another non-expensive and comparatively easier method to detect glycoprotein biomarkers is by ELISA, which uses lectins of diverse specificities. Several of the FDA approved proteins used as cancer biomarkers do not show optimal sensitivities for precise diagnosis of the diseases. In this regard, expression of phosphoproteins is associated with a more specific stage of a particular disease with high sensitivity and specificity. In this review, we discuss the expression of different serum phosphoproteins in various cancers. These phosphoproteins are detected either by phosphoprotein enrichment by immunoprecipitation using phosphospecific antibody and metal oxide affinity chromatography followed by LC-MS/MS or by 2D gel electrophoresis followed by MALDI-ToF/MS analysis. The updated knowledge on phosphorylated proteins in clinical samples from various cancer patients would help to develop these serum phophoproteins as potential diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers of cancer.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNANeoplasmsAntibodies, Phospho-SpecificBiomarkers, TumorChromatography, LiquidEarly Detection of CancerGlycoproteinsHumansLectinsOxidesPhosphoproteinsProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryAntibodies, Phospho-SpecificBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAGlycoproteinsLectinsOxidesPhosphoproteinsbiomarkercancerdephosphorylationphosphoproteinsphosphorylationserum

Identifiers

PMID36293212
PMCPMC9604268
OpenAlexW4306385468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.