ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
Comprehensive In Silico Functional Prediction Analysis of CDKL5 by Single Amino Acid Substitution in the Catalytic Domain.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial Production of CDKL5 Catalytic Domain: Insights in Aggregation, Internal Translation and Phosphorylation Patterns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) is a serine/threonine protein kinase whose pathological mutations cause CDKL5 deficiency disorder. Most missense mutations are concentrated in the catalytic domain. Therefore, anticipating whether mutations in this region affect CDKL5 function is informative for clinical diagnosis. This study comprehensively predicted the pathogenicity of all 5700 missense substitutions in the catalytic domain of CDKL5 using in silico analysis and evaluating their accuracy. Each missense substitution was evaluated as "pathogenic" or "benign". In silico tools PolyPhen-2 HumDiv mode/HumVar mode, PROVEAN, and SIFT were selected individually or in combination with one another to determine their performance using 36 previously reported mutations as a reference. Substitutions predicted as pathogenic were over 88.0% accurate using each of the three tools. The best performance score (accuracy, 97.2%; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 66.7%; and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC), 0.804) was achieved by combining PolyPhen-2 HumDiv, PolyPhen-2 HumVar, and PROVEAN. This provided comprehensive information that could accurately predict the pathogenicity of the disease, which might be used as an aid for clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.