Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36293062›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Genetic Mechanism of Tissue-Specific Expression of

Xinan Wang, Tingting Zhao, Aijun Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xinan WangYellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fisheries Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0473-498X
Tingting ZhaoSchool of Fisheries, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, China.
Aijun MaYellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fisheries Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China.
Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CNZhejiang Ocean University · CN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province 2019LZGC013Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs CARS-47-G01Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2017ASTCPOS04Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2018YFD0900102Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences 2020TD25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we used PCR to measure the levels of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor genes PPARα1, PPARα2, PPARβ, and PPARγ in the intestine, liver, gill, heart, kidney, brain, muscle, spleen, skin, and stomach of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) cultured under different temperature conditions (14, 20, 23, 25, and 28 °C). We used split-split-plot (SSP) analysis of variance, additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis, and genotype main effects and genotype × environment interaction (GGE) biplot analysis to evaluate the genotype × tissue interaction effects on gene expression. The results of the SSP analysis of variance showed that temperature and tissue × gene have highly significant (p < 0.01) effect on the expression of S. maximus PPAR genes. The AMMI analysis results revealed that the expression of PPAR genes at the appropriate temperature (14 °C) mainly depended on genotype × tissue interaction and tissue effects. Under stress temperatures, genotype effects, tissue effects, and genotype × tissue interaction, all had significant effects on the expression of PPAR genes. The contribution of the genotype effect slowly increased with increasing temperature; it increased faster at 20 °C and then slowly declined at 25 °C. The contribution of the tissue effect slowly increased from 14 to 20 °C, where it sharply decreased, and then it stabilized after a slight fluctuation. The contribution of the genotype × tissue interaction effect showed a fluctuating upward trend throughout the experiment, and it had a significant impact on PPAR gene expression. The key temperature at which the three effects changed was 20 °C, indicating that it is the limit temperature for active lipid metabolism under high-temperature stress. The GGE biplot analysis results showed that under suitable water temperature, the expression difference of PPAR genes in the liver was the largest; at 20 and 23 °C, the expression difference in the gill was the largest; and at 25 and 28 °C, the expression difference in the brain was the largest. Overall, our results suggest that the mechanism responsible for PPAR gene expression under the three high temperatures (23, 25, and 28 °C) was relatively consistent, but it differed from that at 20 °C.

Indexed as

FlatfishesPPAR-betaAnimalsPPAR gammaTemperatureWaterPPAR-betaPPAR gammaWatergenotypeinteractionsPPAR genestissueturbot Scophthalmus maximus

Identifiers

PMID36293062
PMCPMC9603064
OpenAlexW4306152331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.