Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292970›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy (FCM) Ensures Representative Tissue in Prostate Cancer Biobanking: A Feasibility Study.

Ulf Titze, Johannes Sommerkamp, Clara Stege, Fried Schneider, Christoph Brochhausen, Birte Schulz, Barbara Titze, Furat Abd Ali, Sasa Pokupic, Karl-Dietrich Sievert and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Virtual Staining of Nonfixed Tissue Histology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ulf TitzeInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3791-8929
Johannes SommerkampInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4609-3148
Clara StegeInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.
Fried SchneiderDepartment of Urology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.
Christoph BrochhausenInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-0247
Birte SchulzInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.
Barbara TitzeInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.
Furat Abd AliDepartment of Urology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.
Sasa PokupicDepartment of Urology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-6554
Karl-Dietrich SievertDepartment of Urology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4814-214X
Torsten HansenInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital OWL of the University of Bielefeld, Campus Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7885-0580
Bielefeld University · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiobanking of prostate carcinoma is particularly challenging due to the actual cancer within the organ often without clear margins. Frozen sections are to date the only way to examine the biobank material for its tumor content. We used ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) to analyze biobank samples prior to cryoasservation.

methods127 punch biopsies were acquired from prostatectomy-specimens from 40 patients. These biopsies were analyzed with a Vivascope 2500-G4 prior to their transfer to the biobank. In difficult cases, larger samples of the prostatectomy specimens were FCM scanned in order to locate tumor foci. After patient acquisition, all samples were taken from the biobank and analyzed. We compared the results of the FCM examinations with the results of conventional histology and measured the DNA content.

resultsWith upstream FCM, the tumor content of biobank samples could be determined with high confidence. The detection rate of representative biobank samples was increased due to the rapid feedback. The biobank samples were suitable for further molecular analysis.

conclusionFCM allows for the first time lossless microscopic analysis of biobank samples prior to their cryoasservation and guarantees representative tumor and normal tissue for further molecular analysis.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksProstatic NeoplasmsDNAFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalDNAbiobankingcryoasservationdigital medicinefluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM)prostate cancer (PCa)targeted sampling

Identifiers

PMID36292970
PMCPMC9603154
OpenAlexW4304588855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.