Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292922›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Focus on PD-1/PD-L1 as a Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer.

Adrian Dumitru, Elena-Codruta Dobrica, Adina Croitoru, Sanda Maria Cretoiu, Bogdan Severus Gaspar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Correlation of PD-L1 expression with different clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical features of ovarian surface epithelial tumors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian DumitruDepartment of Pathology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Elena-Codruta DobricaDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Adina CroitoruDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-6570
Sanda Maria CretoiuDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology and Histology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan Severus GasparSurgery Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-0740
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROTitu Maiorescu University · ROUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is considered one of the most aggressive and deadliest gynecological malignancies worldwide. Unfortunately, the therapeutic methods that are considered the gold standard at this moment are associated with frequent recurrences. Survival in ovarian cancer is associated with the presence of a high number of intra tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Therefore, immunomodulation is considered to have an important role in cancer treatment, and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be useful for restoring T cell-mediated antitumor immunity. However, the data presented in the literature until now are not sufficient to allow for the identification and selection of patients who really respond to immunotherapy among those with ovarian cancer. Although there are some studies with favorable results, more prospective trials are needed in this sense. This review focuses on the current and future perspectives of PD-1/L1 blockade in ovarian cancer and analyzes the most important immune checkpoint inhibitors used, with the aim of achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Future studies and trials are needed to maximize the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in ovarian cancer, as well as in all cancers, in general.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProspective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptorgynecological malignancylncRNAsmiRNAsovarian cancerPD-1/PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID36292922
PMCPMC9603705
OpenAlexW4304185058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.