Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292761›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Comparative Analysis of Molecular RFLP and SNP Markers in Assessing and Understanding the Genetic Diversity of Various Chicken Breeds.

Natalia V Dementieva, Yuri S Shcherbakov, Valentina I Tyshchenko, Valeriy P Terletsky, Anatoly B Vakhrameev, Olga A Nikolaeva, Anna E Ryabova, Anastasiia I Azovtseva, Olga V Mitrofanova, Grigoriy K Peglivanyan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Natalia V DementievaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-9344
Yuri S ShcherbakovRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6434-6287
Valentina I TyshchenkoRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4964-9938
Valeriy P TerletskyPushkin Leningrad State University, Pushkin, 196605 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4043-3823
Anatoly B VakhrameevRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5166-979X
Olga A NikolaevaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-1111
Anna E RyabovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2362-2892
Anastasiia I AzovtsevaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-378X
Olga V MitrofanovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4702-2736
Grigoriy K PeglivanyanRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5194-4851
Natalia R ReinbahRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Research Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, 196601 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6193-5617
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-3226
Michael N RomanovSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3584-4644

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G19438/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the genetic diversity of small populations is important with respect to conserving rare and valuable chicken breeds, as well as discovery and innovation in germplasm research and application. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), the molecular markers that underlie multilocus DNA fingerprinting (MLDF), have historically been employed for this purpose, but over the past two decades, there has been an irreversible shift toward high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of archived MLDF results and new data from whole-genome SNP genotyping (SNPg) among 18 divergently selected breeds representing a large sample of the world gene pool. As a result, we obtained data that fit the general concept of the phylogenetic distribution of the studied breeds and compared them with RFLP and SNP markers. RFLPs were found to be useful markers for retrospective assessment of changes in the genetic architecture and variability underlying the phenotypic variation in chicken populations, especially when samples from previous generations used for MLDF are unavailable for SNPg. These results can facilitate further research necessary to assess the possibility of extrapolating previous MLDF results to study the long-term dynamics of genetic diversity in various small chicken germplasm populations over time. In general, the whole-genome characterization of populations and breeds by multiple SNP loci will further form the basis for the development and implementation of genomic selection with the aim of effective use of the genetic potential of the domestic gene pool in the poultry industry.

Indexed as

ChickensPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsPhylogenyPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRetrospective Studieschicken breedsdivergent selectionDNA fingerprintinggene poolgenetic diversitygenome-wide SNP genotypingphylogenyRFLPs

Identifiers

PMID36292761
PMCPMC9601448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.