Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292731›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

Repair Foci as Liquid Phase Separation: Evidence and Limitations.

Judith Miné-Hattab, Siyu Liu, Angela Taddei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. USP7 at PML Nuclear Bodies: A Protein Interaction Network Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Phase separation induced by active polymerization makes protocells robust against environmental changes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Multi-Scale Imaging of the Dynamic Organization of Chromatin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Judith Miné-HattabInstitut Curie, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Nuclear Dynamics, CEDEX 05, 75248 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9986-4092
Siyu LiuInstitut Curie, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Nuclear Dynamics, CEDEX 05, 75248 Paris, France.
Angela TaddeiInstitut Curie, PSL University, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Nuclear Dynamics, CEDEX 05, 75248 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to DNA double strand breaks (DSB), repair proteins accumulate at damaged sites, forming membrane-less condensates or "foci". The formation of these foci and their disassembly within the proper time window are essential for genome integrity. However, how these membrane-less sub-compartments are formed, maintained and disassembled remains unclear. Recently, several studies across different model organisms proposed that DNA repair foci form via liquid phase separation. In this review, we discuss the current research investigating the physical nature of repair foci. First, we present the different models of condensates proposed in the literature, highlighting the criteria to differentiate them. Second, we discuss evidence of liquid phase separation at DNA repair sites and the limitations of this model to fully describe structures formed in response to DNA damage. Finally, we discuss the origin and possible function of liquid phase separation for DNA repair processes.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNADNA DamageDNA RepairDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA repairdouble strand breakliquid phase separation

Identifiers

PMID36292731
PMCPMC9602295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.