ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Telemedicine, Telepsychiatry and COVID-19 Pandemic: Future Prospects for Global Health.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Could Artificial Intelligence Change the Doctor-Patient Relationship? A Medical Ethics Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring the Application of AI and Extended Reality Technologies in Metaverse-Driven Mental Health Solutions: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Inferior Alveolar Nerve Impairment Following Third-Molar Extraction: Management of Complications and Medicolegal Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Current status of neurotrauma management in resource-limited settings.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The COVID-19 pandemic and the worldwide online interest in telepsychiatry: an infodemiological study from 2004 to 2022.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- The era of increasing cancer survivorship: Trends in fertility preservation, medico-legal implications, and ethical challenges.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Reevaluating Pediatric Osteomyelitis with Osteoarticular Tuberculosis: Addressing Diagnostic Delays and Improving Treatment Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- COVID-19 and Female Fertility: An Observational Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study: Upholding Reproductive Rights in Emergency Circumstances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dental Identification System in Public Health: Innovations and Ethical Challenges: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS): A Narrative Review and Legal Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Factors associated with postoperative quality of life in patients with intertrochanteric fracture.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Pandemic-induced healthcare shifts: an observational analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnancies.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Patient's and Practionner's Experiences of a First Face-to-Face vs. Remote Orthodontic Consultation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Symptomatic COVID-19 in Pregnancy: Hospital Cohort Data between May 2020 and April 2021, Risk Factors and Medicolegal Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Are Health Information Systems Ready for the Digital Transformation in Portugal? Challenges and Future Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Determinants of experience & satisfaction in telehealth psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients & providers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Assessing perceived participation among older adults total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients six months post-surgery: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no denying that demand for telemedicine and telepsychiatry services has been on the rise, as the COVID-19 pandemic engulfed the world and upset the daily lives and certainties of us all. Such growth, however, calls for a comprehensive analysis and assessment of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in such innovative approaches, which are bound to change and evolve as the fourth industrial revolution unfolds before our eyes. The authors have set out to analyze the complexities and distinctive features of telemedicine and telepsychiatry by focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of such approaches and analyzing research findings, recommendations, and guidelines by scientific societies and institutions, for the ultimate purpose of striking a tenable balance between technological innovations and the ethics and moral imperative of guaranteeing equal access to care for everyone, irrespective of social and financial status. The European regulatory and legislative scenario has been briefly outlined, and the standards for the medicolegal sustainability of such practices have been explored. Ultimately, in order to improve accessibility without compromising the quality of care, new broadly shared ethical standards, best practices, and guidelines need to be prioritized. National legislative initiatives and the international sharing of information need to be encouraged, for the ultimate purpose of optimizing and harmonizing telemedicine-based care for the sake of all patients. As technology moves forward and evolves, so must the normative standards and guidelines on which professionals must be able to rely when delivering telemedicine-based care in an ethically and legally viable fashion. From that perspective, addressing the digital divide means enabling more people to receive care and should therefore be seen as part and parcel of the effort to uphold the universal human right to health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.