Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292487›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Usability of Mobile Solutions Intended for Diagnostic Images-A Systematic Review.

Jakub Kufel, Katarzyna Bargieł, Maciej Koźlik, Łukasz Czogalik, Piotr Dudek, Aleksander Jaworski, Mikołaj Magiera, Wiktoria Bartnikowska, Maciej Cebula, Zbigniew Nawrat and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jakub KufelDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7633-3600
Katarzyna BargiełFaculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.
Maciej KoźlikDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Disease, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6016-1891
Łukasz CzogalikProfessor Zbigniew Religa Student Scientific Association at the Department of Biophysic, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.
Piotr DudekProfessor Zbigniew Religa Student Scientific Association at the Department of Biophysic, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.
Aleksander JaworskiProfessor Zbigniew Religa Student Scientific Association at the Department of Biophysic, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.
Mikołaj MagieraProfessor Zbigniew Religa Student Scientific Association at the Department of Biophysic, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9952-9681
Wiktoria BartnikowskaFaculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.
Maciej CebulaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4917-8526
Zbigniew NawratDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland.
Katarzyna GruszczyńskaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing popularity of mobile devices, they still have not found widespread use in medicine. This is due to the procedures in a given place, differences in the availability of mobile devices between individual institutions or lack of appropriate legal regulations and accreditation by relevant institutions. Numerous studies have been conducted and compared the usability of mobile solutions designed for diagnostic images evaluation on various mobile devices and applications with classic stationary descriptive stations. This study is an attempt to compare the usefulness of currently available mobile applications which are used in the medical industry, focusing on imaging diagnostics. As a consequence of the healthcare sector's diversity, it is also not possible to design a universal mobile application, which results in a multitude of software available on the market and makes it difficult to reliably compile and compare studies included in this systematic review. Despite these differences, it was possible to identify both positive and negative features of portable methods analyzing radiological images. The mobile application of the golden mean in hospital infrastructure should be widely available, with convenient and simple usage. Our future research will focus on development in the use of mobile devices and applications in the medical sector.

Indexed as

mobile applications in radiologymobile devices in radiologymobile work with radiological images

Identifiers

PMID36292487
PMCPMC9602351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.