Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292405›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Prehospital Stroke Care, Paramedic Training Needs, and Hospital-Directed Feedback in Lithuania.

Kazimieras Melaika, Lukas Sveikata, Aleksandras Vilionskis, Adam Wiśniewski, Kristaps Jurjans, Andrius Klimašauskas, Dalius Jatužis, Rytis Masiliūnas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pre-Hospital Stroke Care beyond the MSU.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kazimieras MelaikaCenter of Neurology, Vilnius University, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-0635
Lukas SveikataJ. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8015-7929
Aleksandras VilionskisClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Adam WiśniewskiDepartment of Neurology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5839-0126
Kristaps JurjansDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Riga Stradins University, 1002 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-1730-8354
Andrius KlimašauskasCenter of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Therapy and Pain Management, Vilnius University, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Dalius JatužisCenter of Neurology, Vilnius University, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-4795
Rytis MasiliūnasCenter of Neurology, Vilnius University, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-9682

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation P2GEP3_191584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) are the first health care contact for the majority of stroke patients. However, there is a lack of data on the current paramedics’ hospital-directed feedback and training needs across different health care settings. We aimed to evaluate paramedics’ prehospital stroke care knowledge, training needs, and current status of feedback on suspected stroke patients. Methods: We surveyed paramedics from the Vilnius region from September to November 2019 and compared the answers between the city and the district agencies. The questionnaire content included questions on paramedics’ demographic characteristics, prehospital stroke care self-assessment, knowledge on stroke mimics, stroke training needs, and the importance of hospital-directed feedback on suspected stroke patients. Results: A total number of 161 paramedics (or 49.4% of all paramedics from our stroke care network) were surveyed, with more district paramedics rating their prehospital stroke care knowledge as inadequate (44.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32.8−57.6) vs. 28.1% (95% CI 20.1−27.8), p = 0.028). In addition, more district paramedics indicated a need for additional stroke training (83.1% (95% CI 71.5−90.5) vs. 69.8% (60.0−78.1), p = 0.043). However, respondents reported being the most confident while dealing with stroke (71.3%, 95% CI 63.8−77.7) compared to other time-critical conditions (p < 0.001). Vertigo (60.8%, 95% CI 53.0−68.0), brain tumors (56.3%, 95% CI 48.5−63.8), and seizures (54.4%, 95% CI 46.7−62.0) were indicated as the most common stroke mimics. Only 6.2% (95% CI 3.4−11.1) of respondents received formal feedback on the outcome of suspected stroke patients brought to the emergency department. Conclusions: A high proportion of paramedics self-perceive having inadequate stroke knowledge and an urgent need for further stroke training. The EMS staff indicate receiving insufficient feedback on suspected stroke patients, even though its usefulness is perceived as paramount.

Indexed as

emergency medical servicesprehospital carestrokesurveytraining

Identifiers

PMID36292405
PMCPMC9601945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.