Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292378›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Factors Associated with the Patient/Client Use of Report Cards, Physician Rating Websites, Social Media, and Google for Hospital and Physician Selection: A Nationwide Survey.

Tsung-Tai Chen, Chyi-In Wu, Ming-Hsin Phoebe Chiu, Jia-Lien Hsu, Mao-Hung Liao, Ya-Seng Arthur Hsueh, Wei-Chih Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tsung-Tai ChenDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei 242, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-6911
Chyi-In WuInstitute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsin Phoebe ChiuGraduate Institute of Library and Information Studies, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Jia-Lien HsuDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei 242, Taiwan.
Mao-Hung LiaoYonghe Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei 234, Taiwan.
Ya-Seng Arthur HsuehCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Wei-Chih SuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taipei Tzu-Chi Hospital, New Taipei 231, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the factors associated with the different uses of report cards, physician rating websites, social media, and Google, including awareness, physician finding, and decision-making based on reviews from the patient/client perspective.

methodsWe used computer-assisted telephone interviews to conduct a nationwide representative survey in Taiwan.

resultsThe urbanization level of the area, income, and long-term health conditions were not associated with the three kinds of usage of the websites studied. Seeking health information was an important factor in the three kinds of website use. The employment industry was associated with awareness, and education level was associated with physician seeking and actions based on reviews.

conclusionsDifferent factors influenced the three kinds of usage: awareness, actual use (i.e., finding an appropriate physician), and decision-making based on reviews. Seeking health information is of primary importance regardless of how the websites are used. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Policy-makers should focus on educating individuals working outside the health care sector to increase awareness of these websites and to assist individuals with low levels of education in increasing their use of these websites.

Indexed as

Googleinfluencing factorsnationwide surveyphysician rating websites (PRWs)social media

Identifiers

PMID36292378
PMCPMC9602070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.