Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292301›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Pregnancy, Mental Well-Being and Lockdown: A Nationwide Online Survey in France.

Laurent Gaucher, Chloé Barasinski, Corinne Dupont, Chantal Razurel, Swann Pichon, Emma Leavy, Sylvie Viaux-Savelon, Marion Cortet, Nicolas Franck, Frédéric Haesebaert and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laurent GaucherMidwifery Department, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-5446
Chloé BarasinskiInstitut Pascal Axe TGI-DecisiPH. CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Corinne DupontRéseau Périnatal Aurore, F-69004 Lyon, France.
Chantal RazurelMidwifery Department, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland.
Swann PichonMidwifery Department, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5697-702X
Emma LeavyMidwifery Department, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-8076
Sylvie Viaux-SavelonHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, F-69004 Lyon, France.
Marion CortetHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, F-69004 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-7340
Nicolas FranckCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (Ressource Center for Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Cognitive Remediation), Hôpital Le Vinatier, F-69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-5108
Frédéric HaesebaertUMR, 5229, CNRS & Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, F-69008 Lyon, France.
Julie HaesebaertResearch on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE) INSERM U1290, Pôle de Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, F-69008 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9109-5604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the mental well-being of French women who were and were not pregnant during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. We performed a nationwide online quantitative survey including all women between 18 and 45 years of age during the second and third weeks of global lockdown (25 March-7 April 2020). The main outcome measure was mental well-being measured by the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). This study analysed 275 responses from pregnant women and compared them with those from a propensity score-matched sample of 825 non-pregnant women. In this French sample, the median WEMWBS score was 49.0 and did not differ by pregnancy status. Women living in urban areas reported better well-being, while those with sleep disorders or who spent more than an hour a day watching the news reported poorer well-being. During the first lockdown in France, women had relatively low mental well-being scores, with no significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women. More than ever, health-care workers need to find a way to maintain their support for women's well-being. Minor daily annoyances of pregnancy, such as insomnia, should not be trivialised because they are a potential sign of poor well-being.

Indexed as

mental healthpandemicpregnant womenquarantinesurvey

Identifiers

PMID36292301
PMCPMC9602192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.