Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292278›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Classification Algorithms Used in Predicting Glaucoma Progression.

Filip Tarcoveanu, Florin Leon, Silvia Curteanu, Dorin Chiselita, Camelia Margareta Bogdanici, Nicoleta Anton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Calculating Enzyme Inhibition with Random Forests.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filip TarcoveanuOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, University Street No 16, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Florin LeonFaculty of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 27 Mangeron Street, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-9145
Silvia CurteanuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection "Cristofor Simionescu", "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 73 Mangeron Street, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Dorin ChiselitaOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, University Street No 16, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Camelia Margareta BogdaniciOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, University Street No 16, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9542-7714
Nicoleta AntonOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iasi, University Street No 16, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4987-5049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, various machine learning algorithms were used in order to predict the evolution of open-angle glaucoma (POAG). The datasets were built containing clinical observations and objective measurements made at the Countess of Chester Hospital in the UK and at the "St. Spiridon" Hospital of Iași, Romania. Using these datasets, different classification problems were proposed. The evaluation of glaucoma progression was conducted based on parameters such as VFI (Visual field index), MD (Mean Deviation), PSD (Pattern standard deviation), and RNFL (Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer). As classification tools, the following algorithms were used: Multilayer Perceptron, Random Forest, Random Tree, C4.5, k-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, and Non-Nested Generalized Exemplars. The best results, with an accuracy of over 90%, were obtained with Multilayer Perceptron and Random Forest algorithms. The NNGE algorithm also proved very useful in creating a hierarchy of the input values according to their influence (weight) on the considered outputs. On the other hand, the decision tree algorithms gave us insight into the logic used in their classification, which is of practical importance in obtaining additional information regarding the rationale behind a certain rule or decision.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassification algorithmsglaucomamachine learningpredictions

Identifiers

PMID36292278
PMCPMC9601916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.