ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation System for External Ventricular Drain.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmented Reality Integration in Skull Base Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Single-use optical tracking navigation for external ventricular drain placement: Preclinical 3D-Printed and cadaveric evaluation with a systematic review.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive protocol for mixed reality visualization and navigation using 3D Slicer.PloS one · 2026Article
- Augmented reality for external ventricular drain placement: Model alignment and integration software.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Article
- The Feasibility and Accuracy of Holographic Navigation with Laser Crosshair Simulator Registration on a Mixed-Reality Display.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing interpretability and accuracy of AI models in healthcare: a comprehensive review on challenges and future directions.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Review
- Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- A Novel Registration Method for a Mixed Reality Navigation System Based on a Laser Crosshair Simulator: A Technical Note.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Augmented Reality in Neurosurgery: A New Paradigm for Training.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Augmented reality surgery systems are playing an increasing role in the operating room, but applying such systems to neurosurgery presents particular challenges. In addition to using augmented reality technology to display the position of the surgical target position in 3D in real time, the application must also display the scalpel entry point and scalpel orientation, with accurate superposition on the patient. To improve the intuitiveness, efficiency, and accuracy of extra-ventricular drain surgery, this paper proposes an augmented reality surgical navigation system which accurately superimposes the surgical target position, scalpel entry point, and scalpel direction on a patient's head and displays this data on a tablet. The accuracy of the optical measurement system (NDI Polaris Vicra) was first independently tested, and then complemented by the design of functions to help the surgeon quickly identify the surgical target position and determine the preferred entry point. A tablet PC was used to display the superimposed images of the surgical target, entry point, and scalpel on top of the patient, allowing for correct scalpel orientation. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) results for the patient's computed tomography were used to create a phantom and its associated AR model. This model was then imported into the application, which was then executed on the tablet. In the preoperative phase, the technician first spent 5-7 min to superimpose the virtual image of the head and the scalpel. The surgeon then took 2 min to identify the intended target position and entry point position on the tablet, which then dynamically displayed the superimposed image of the head, target position, entry point position, and scalpel (including the scalpel tip and scalpel orientation). Multiple experiments were successfully conducted on the phantom, along with six practical trials of clinical neurosurgical EVD. In the 2D-plane-superposition model, the optical measurement system (NDI Polaris Vicra) provided highly accurate visualization (2.01 ± 1.12 mm). In hospital-based clinical trials, the average technician preparation time was 6 min, while the surgeon required an average of 3.5 min to set the target and entry-point positions and accurately overlay the orientation with an NDI surgical stick. In the preparation phase, the average time required for the DICOM-formatted image processing and program import was 120 ± 30 min. The accuracy of the designed augmented reality optical surgical navigation system met clinical requirements, and can provide a visual and intuitive guide for neurosurgeons. The surgeon can use the tablet application to obtain real-time DICOM-formatted images of the patient, change the position of the surgical entry point, and instantly obtain an updated surgical path and surgical angle. The proposed design can be used as the basis for various augmented reality brain surgery navigation systems in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.