ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Value of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Improving the Quality of Low-Dose Chest CT Images.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Image-Domain GAN Denoising for Sn100 kVp Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT: A Retrospective Paired Image-Quality Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility of reducing radiation dose and contrast dose while improving image quality in dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography : Use of low-energy virtual monochromatic images with deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Improving visibility of small anatomical details on low and ultra-low dose computed tomography with artificial intelligence-based image reconstructions.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Reduction of radiation dose to the eye lens during common CT examinations of the head, paranasal sinus, and cervical spine in emergency settings: A phantom study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Surgical Aspects of Treatment of the Lung Cancer Found in Low-Dose CT-Based Screenings.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Image-domain deep learning denoising for low-dose chest CT on a single 128-slice CT platform: a retrospective image-quality assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive linkage between molecular biology and imaging radiomics for thyroid nodules.World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Deep learning reconstruction enhances tophus detection in a dual-energy CT phantom study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction on Tumor Visibility and Diagnostic Confidence in Computed Tomography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Low Tube Voltage (100 kV) Combined with ASIR-V on the Visualization and Image Quality of the Adamkiewicz Artery: A Comparison with 120 kV Protocol.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the value of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm (GE Healthcare’s TrueFidelity™) in improving the image quality of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest. First, we retrospectively extracted raw data of chest LDCT from 50 patients and reconstructed them by using model-based adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo at 50% (ASIR-V 50%) and DLIR at medium and high strengths (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). Three sets of images were obtained. Next, two radiographers measured the mean CT value/image signal and standard deviation (SD) in Hounsfield units at the region of interest (ROI) and calculated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two radiologists subjectively evaluated the image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. The differences between the groups of data were analyzed through a repeated measures ANOVA or the Friedman test. Last, our result show that the three reconstructions did not differ significantly in signal (p > 0.05) but had significant differences in noise, SNR, and CNR (p < 0.001). The subjective scores significantly differed among the three reconstruction modalities in soft tissue (p < 0.001) but not in lung tissue (p > 0.05). DLIR-H had the best noise reduction ability and improved SNR and CNR without distorting the image texture, followed by DLIR-M and ASIR-V 50%. In summary, DLIR can provide a higher image quality at the same dose, enhancing the physicians’ diagnostic confidence and improving the diagnostic efficacy of LDCT for lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.