Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292231›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dual-Energy CT for Accurate Discrimination of Intraperitoneal Hematoma and Intestinal Structures.

Moritz T Winkelmann, Florian Hagen, Kerstin Artzner, Malte N Bongers, Christoph Artzner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moritz T WinkelmannDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Florian HagenDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1215-9428
Kerstin ArtznerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Malte N BongersDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Christoph ArtznerDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) with virtual unenhanced imaging (VNC) and iodine maps (IM) to differentiate between intraperitoneal hematomas (IH) and bowel structures (BS) compared to linearly blended DECT (DE-LB) images (equivalent to single-energy CT). This retrospective study included the DECT of 30 patients (mean age: 64.5 ± 15.1 years, 19 men) with intraperitoneal hematomas and 30 negative controls. VNC, IM, and DE-LB were calculated. Imaging follow-up and surgical reports were used as references. Three readers assessed diagnostic performance and confidence in distinguishing IH and BS for DE-LB, VNC, and IM. Diagnostic confidence was assessed on a five-point Likert scale. The mean values of VNC, IM, and DE-LB were compared with nonparametric tests. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results are reported as medians with interquartile ranges. Subjective image analysis showed higher diagnostic performance (sensitivity: 96.7−100% vs. 88.2−96.7%; specificity: 100% vs. 96.7−100%; p < 0.0001; ICC: 0.96−0.99) and confidence (Likert: 5; IRQ [5−5] vs. 4, IRQ [3−4; 4−5]; p < 0.0001; ICC: 0.80−0.96) for DECT compared to DE-LB. On objective image analysis, IM values for DECT showed significant differences between IH (3.9 HU; IQR [1.6, 8.0]) and BS (39.5 HU; IQR [29.2, 43.3]; p ≤ 0.0001). VNC analysis revealed a significantly higher attenuation of hematomas (50.5 HU; IQR [44.4, 59.4]) than BS (26.6 HU; IQR [22.8, 32.4]; p ≤ 0.0001). DE-LB revealed no significant differences between hematomas (60.5 HU, IQR [52.7, 63.9]) and BS (63.9 HU, IQR [58.0, 68.8]; p > 0.05). ROC analysis revealed the highest AUC values and sensitivity for IM (AUC = 100%; threshold by Youden-Index ≤ 19 HU) and VNC (0.93; ≥34.1 HU) compared to DE-LB (0.64; ≤63.8; p < 0.001). DECT is suitable for accurate discrimination between IH and BS by calculating iodine maps and VNC images.

Indexed as

dual-energy CTintraabdominal hematomasiodine mapsvirtual unenhanced imaging

Identifiers

PMID36292231
PMCPMC9601488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.