Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292224›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Characterization of Ischemic Stroke with MRI Images: A Review.

Asit Subudhi, Pratyusa Dash, Manoranjan Mohapatra, Ru-San Tan, U Rajendra Acharya, Sukanta Sabut

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asit SubudhiDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, ITER, SOA Deemed to be University, Odisha 700107, India.
Pratyusa DashDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata 700107, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-9857
Manoranjan MohapatraDepartment of Radiology, KIMS, KIIT Deemed to be University, Odisha 751024, India.
Ru-San TanDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
U Rajendra AcharyaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore 599489, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-8552
Sukanta SabutSchool of Electronics Engineering, KIIT Deemed to be University, Odisha 751024, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a standard tool for the diagnosis of stroke, but its manual interpretation by experts is arduous and time-consuming. Thus, there is a need for computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) models for the automatic segmentation and classification of stroke on brain MRI. The heterogeneity of stroke pathogenesis, morphology, image acquisition modalities, sequences, and intralesional tissue signal intensity, as well as lesion-to-normal tissue contrast, pose significant challenges to the development of such systems. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in predictive neuroimaging diagnosis and prognostication. This paper reviews image processing and machine learning techniques that have been applied to detect ischemic stroke on brain MRI, including details on image acquisition, pre-processing, techniques to segment, extraction of features, and classification into stroke types. The main objective of this work is to find the state-of-art machine learning techniques used to predict the ischemic stroke and their application in clinical set-up. The article selection is performed according to PRISMA guideline. The state-of-the-art on automated MRI stroke diagnosis, with a focus on machine learning, is discussed, along with its advantages and limitations. We found that the various machine learning models discussed in this article are able to detect the infarcts with an acceptable accuracy of 70-90%. However, no one has highlighted the time complexity to predict the stroke in the model developed, which is an important factor. The work concludes with proposals for future recommendations for building efficient and robust deep learning (DL) models for quantitative brain MRI analysis. In recent work, with the application of DL approaches, using large datasets to train the models has improved the detection accuracy and reduced computational complexity. We suggest that the design of a decision support system based on artificial intelligence (AI) and clinical data presenting symptoms is essential to support clinicians to accelerate diagnosis and timeous therapy in the emergency management of stroke.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrain strokecomputer-aided-diagnosisdecision support systemmachine learningmedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID36292224
PMCPMC9600234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.