Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292220›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Custom-Made Direct Metal Laser Sintering Titanium Subperiosteal Implants in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for Severe Bone-Deficient Patients-A Pilot Study.

Alexandru Nemtoi, Vlad Covrig, Ana Nemtoi, George Stoica, Ruxandra Vatavu, Danisia Haba, Irina Zetu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandru NemtoiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, "Stefan cel Mare" University, 13 Universitatii Str., 720229 Suceava, Romania.
Vlad CovrigDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, "Stefan cel Mare" University, 13 Universitatii Str., 720229 Suceava, Romania.
Ana NemtoiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Str., 700115 Iasi, Romania.
George StoicaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Str., 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Ruxandra VatavuDepartment of Morpho-Functional Sciences I, Faculty of Medicine, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Str., 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Danisia HabaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Str., 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Irina ZetuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii Str., 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava · ROGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNowadays, a combination of classical subperiosteal implant designs with 3D imaging and printing allows one to reduce treatment time and provides support for fixed prostheses in cases where other techniques do not provide satisfactory results. This study aims to present a digital technique for the manufacturing of custom-made subperiosteal implants and what complications might appear after this type of surgery.

methodsSixteen patients treated with a custom-made DMLS titanium subperiosteal implant during the period between October 2021 and February 2022 were enrolled in the study. Orthopantomography (OPT) and cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) were recorded for all patients. The measurements taken into account in this study were the fit and stability of implants, duration of surgery, implant survival, and early and late complications.

resultsThe fit of the implants was extremely satisfactory, with a mean rating of 4 out of 5. The mean duration of the intervention was 86.18 min. At the end of the study, one implant was lost due to insufficient fit and recurrent, untreatable infections. Eleven implants (69%) were placed on the maxillary and five (31%) implants were placed on the mandible.

conclusionsTaking this into consideration, custom-made DMLS titanium subperiosteal implants could present satisfactory implant survival and low complication rates.

Indexed as

CBCTdirect metal laser sinteringsubperiosteal implanttitanium implants

Identifiers

PMID36292220
PMCPMC9601393
OpenAlexW4306773322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.