ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Use of Differential Entropy for Automated Emotion Recognition in a Virtual Reality Environment with EEG Signals.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge-Guided Deep Learning with Clinical EEG Biomarkers for Automated Dementia Detection and Staging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- EEG emotion recognition via multilevel entropy analysis: The power of entropy of entropy on phase dynamics.PloS one · 2026Article
- Graph-theoretical analysis of EEG-based functional connectivity during emotional experience in virtual reality for emotion recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cross-subject EEG signals-based emotion recognition using contrastive learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Virtual reality-enabled high-performance emotion estimation with the most significant channel pairs.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Machine learning based classification of presence utilizing psychophysiological signals in immersive virtual environments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optimized virtual reality design through user immersion level detection with novel feature fusion and explainable artificial intelligence.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion recognition is one of the most important issues in human-computer interaction (HCI), neuroscience, and psychology fields. It is generally accepted that emotion recognition with neural data such as electroencephalography (EEG) signals, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is better than other emotion detection methods such as speech, mimics, body language, facial expressions, etc., in terms of reliability and accuracy. In particular, EEG signals are bioelectrical signals that are frequently used because of the many advantages they offer in the field of emotion recognition. This study proposes an improved approach for EEG-based emotion recognition on a publicly available newly published dataset, VREED. Differential entropy (DE) features were extracted from four wavebands (theta 4-8 Hz, alpha 8-13 Hz, beta 13-30 Hz, and gamma 30-49 Hz) to classify two emotional states (positive/negative). Five classifiers, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Naïve Bayesian (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and Logistic Regression (LR) were employed with DE features for the automated classification of two emotional states. In this work, we obtained the best average accuracy of 76.22% ± 2.06 with the SVM classifier in the classification of two states. Moreover, we observed from the results that the highest average accuracy score was produced with the gamma band, as previously reported in studies in EEG-based emotion recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.