Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292187›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Predicting Bacteremia among Septic Patients Based on ED Information by Machine Learning Methods: A Comparative Study.

Vivian Goh, Yu-Jung Chou, Ching-Chi Lee, Mi-Chia Ma, William Yu Chung Wang, Chih-Hao Lin, Chih-Chia Hsieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivian GohDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
Yu-Jung ChouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
Ching-Chi LeeClinical Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4949-2742
Mi-Chia MaDepartment of Statistics and Institute of Data Science, College of Management, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-3004
William Yu Chung WangWaikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
Chih-Hao LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0042-0131
Chih-Chia HsiehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-5742
National Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TWUniversity of Waikato · NZ

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2634-F006-023-Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSC102-2314-B-006-079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBacteremia is a common but life-threatening infectious disease. However, a well-defined rule to assess patient risk of bacteremia and the urgency of blood culture is lacking. The aim of this study is to establish a predictive model for bacteremia in septic patients using available big data in the emergency department (ED) through logistic regression and other machine learning (ML) methods. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Taiwan from January 2015 to December 2019. ED adults (≥18 years old) with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and receiving blood cultures during the ED stay were included. Models I and II were established based on logistic regression, both of which were derived from support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). Net reclassification index was used to determine which model was superior.

resultsDuring the study period, 437,969 patients visited the study ED, and 40,395 patients were enrolled. Patients diagnosed with bacteremia accounted for 7.7% of the cohort. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) in models I and II was 0.729 (95% CI, 0.718-0.740) and 0.731 (95% CI, 0.721-0.742), with Akaike information criterion (AIC) of 16,840 and 16,803, respectively. The performance of model II was superior to that of model I. The AUROC values of models III and IV in the validation dataset were 0.730 (95% CI, 0.713-0.747) and 0.705 (0.688-0.722), respectively. There is no statistical evidence to support that the performance of the model created with logistic regression is superior to those created by SVM and RF. DISCUSSION: The advantage of the SVM or RF model is that the prediction model is more elastic and not limited to a linear relationship. The advantage of the LR model is that it is easy to explain the influence of the independent variable on the response variable. These models could help medical staff identify high-risk patients and prevent unnecessary antibiotic use. The performance of SVM and RF was not inferior to that of logistic regression.

conclusionsWe established models that provide discrimination in predicting bacteremia among patients with sepsis. The reported results could inspire researchers to adopt ML in their development of prediction algorithms.

Indexed as

bacteremiablood culturelogistic regressionmachine learningnet reclassification index

Identifiers

PMID36292187
PMCPMC9600599
OpenAlexW4306377200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.