ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predicting Bacteremia among Septic Patients Based on ED Information by Machine Learning Methods: A Comparative Study.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparable Outcomes in Suspected Septic Shock: A Retrospective Study of Emergency Department Patients With and Without Bacteremia.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Outcome prediction for late-onset sepsis after premature birth.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Developing Machine-Learning Models to Predict Bacteremia in Febrile Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Large Center.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Leveraging explainable artificial intelligence for early prediction of bloodstream infections using historical electronic health records.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Early detection of bloodstream infection in critically ill children using artificial intelligence.Acute and critical care · 2024Article
- Physical frailty identification using machine learning to explore the 5-item FRAIL scale, Cardiovascular Health Study index, and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBacteremia is a common but life-threatening infectious disease. However, a well-defined rule to assess patient risk of bacteremia and the urgency of blood culture is lacking. The aim of this study is to establish a predictive model for bacteremia in septic patients using available big data in the emergency department (ED) through logistic regression and other machine learning (ML) methods. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at the ED of National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Taiwan from January 2015 to December 2019. ED adults (≥18 years old) with systemic inflammatory response syndrome and receiving blood cultures during the ED stay were included. Models I and II were established based on logistic regression, both of which were derived from support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). Net reclassification index was used to determine which model was superior.
resultsDuring the study period, 437,969 patients visited the study ED, and 40,395 patients were enrolled. Patients diagnosed with bacteremia accounted for 7.7% of the cohort. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) in models I and II was 0.729 (95% CI, 0.718-0.740) and 0.731 (95% CI, 0.721-0.742), with Akaike information criterion (AIC) of 16,840 and 16,803, respectively. The performance of model II was superior to that of model I. The AUROC values of models III and IV in the validation dataset were 0.730 (95% CI, 0.713-0.747) and 0.705 (0.688-0.722), respectively. There is no statistical evidence to support that the performance of the model created with logistic regression is superior to those created by SVM and RF. DISCUSSION: The advantage of the SVM or RF model is that the prediction model is more elastic and not limited to a linear relationship. The advantage of the LR model is that it is easy to explain the influence of the independent variable on the response variable. These models could help medical staff identify high-risk patients and prevent unnecessary antibiotic use. The performance of SVM and RF was not inferior to that of logistic regression.
conclusionsWe established models that provide discrimination in predicting bacteremia among patients with sepsis. The reported results could inspire researchers to adopt ML in their development of prediction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.