ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Differentiation of Intracerebral Tumor Entities with Quantitative Contrast Attenuation and Iodine Mapping in Dual-Layer Computed Tomography.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical applications of photon-counting CT in oncology: an organ-based pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- The value of dual-layer detector spectral CT multiparameter imaging in distinguishing between benign lesions and carcinomas of the larynx and hypopharynx.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Smart Visualization of Medical Images as a Tool in the Function of Education in Neuroradiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate if quantitative contrast enhancement and iodine mapping of common brain tumor (BT) entities may correctly differentiate between tumor etiologies in standardized stereotactic CT protocols. Material and Methods: A retrospective monocentric study of 139 consecutive standardized dual-layer dual-energy CT (dlDECT) scans conducted prior to the stereotactic needle biopsy of untreated primary brain tumor lesions. Attenuation of contrast-enhancing BT was derived from polyenergetic images as well as spectral iodine density maps (IDM) and their contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNR) were determined using ROI measures in contrast-enhancing BT and healthy contralateral white matter. The measures were correlated to histopathology regarding tumor entity, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and MGMT mutation status. Results: The cohort included 52 female and 76 male patients, mean age of 59.4 (±17.1) years. Brain lymphomas showed the highest attenuation (IDM CNR 3.28 ± 1,23), significantly higher than glioblastoma (2.37 ± 1.55, p < 0.005) and metastases (1.95 ± 1.14, p < 0.02), while the differences between glioblastomas and metastases were not significant. These strongly enhancing lesions differed from oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma (Grade II and III) that showed IDM CNR in the range of 1.22−1.27 (±0.45−0.82). Conventional attenuation measurements in DLCT data performed equally or slightly superior to iodine density measurements. Conclusion: Quantitative attenuation and iodine density measurements of contrast-enhancing brain tumors are feasible imaging biomarkers for the discrimination of cerebral tumor lesions but not specifically for single tumor entities. CNR based on simple HU measurements performed equally or slightly superior to iodine quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.