ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Deep Learning Assessment for Mining Important Medical Image Features of Various Modalities.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) is a well-established pipeline for feature extraction in medical and nonmedical imaging tasks, such as object detection, segmentation, and classification. However, DL faces the issue of explainability, which prohibits reliable utilisation in everyday clinical practice. This study evaluates DL methods for their efficiency in revealing and suggesting potential image biomarkers. Eleven biomedical image datasets of various modalities are utilised, including SPECT, CT, photographs, microscopy, and X-ray. Seven state-of-the-art CNNs are employed and tuned to perform image classification in tasks. The main conclusion of the research is that DL reveals potential biomarkers in several cases, especially when the models are trained from scratch in domains where low-level features such as shapes and edges are not enough to make decisions. Furthermore, in some cases, device acquisition variations slightly affect the performance of DL models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.