Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36292013›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Annotation Tools in Gastrointestinal Polyp Annotation.

Ola Selnes, Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer, Aymeric Histace, Gunnar Baatrup, Anastasios Koulaouzidis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ola SelnesDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark.
Thomas Bjørsum-MeyerDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark.
Aymeric HistaceETIS UMR 8051, CY Paris Cergy University, ENSEA, CNRS, 95000 Cergy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3029-4412
Gunnar BaatrupDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark.
Anastasios KoulaouzidisDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-489X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a valid alternative to conventional gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy tools. In CE, annotation tools are crucial in developing large and annotated medical image databases for training deep neural networks (DNN). We provide an overview of the described and in-use various annotation systems available, focusing on the annotation of adenomatous polyp pathology in the GI tract. Some studies present promising results regarding time efficiency by implementing automated labelling features in annotation systems. Thus, data are inadequate regarding the general overview for users, and may also be more specific on which features provided are necessary for polyp annotation.

Indexed as

annotation toolautomated labellingcamera capsule endoscopycomputer-aided diagnosispolyp annotation

Identifiers

PMID36292013
PMCPMC9600922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.