ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Pathological Nodal Staging Score for Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Tool of Adequate Nodal Staging.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A 3 M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a subset of gastric cancer with distinct histological and inconsistent prognosis outcome. Currently, the association between the adequate regional lymph node and proper nodal staging in GSRCC is rarely noticed. Materials and methods: Clinical data of GSRCC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Beta-binomial distribution model was employed for the estimation of the probability of missing nodal disease, followed by the development of a nodal staging score (NSS). Results: A total of 561 GSRCC patients were included in this study, with 193 in lymph node-negative and 368 in lymph node-positive diagnoses. As the number of examined lymph nodes increased, the probability of missing nodal disease decreased rapidly, with T stage-specific curves. The probability of missing nodal disease in T4 was lower than that in T1. NSS calculation indicated that T1 stage patients commonly had NSS > 0.8. However, with the NSS of T2−T4 to reach 0.8, the number of examined lymph node was required to be larger than 12 in T2, 17 in T3 and 27 in T4. NSS ≥ 0.75 (quantile 75%) subgroup in T2−T4 subgroups tended to have better outcome; however, without significant prognostic value. Conclusions: NSS is served as a reliable and feasible tool in adequate nodal staging of GSRCC with statistical basis and provides further evidence for clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.