ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Portable ECG Device in Rowing Athletes.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAthletes can experience exercise-induced transient arrythmias during high-intensity exercise or competition, which are difficult to capture on traditional Holter monitors or replicate in clinical exercise testing. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a portable single channel ECG sensor and data recorder (PluxECG) and to evaluate the confidence and reliability in interpretation of ECGs recorded using the PluxECG during remote rowing.
methodsThis was a two-phase study on rowing athletes. Phase I assessed the accuracy and precision of heart rate (HR) using the PluxECG system compared to a reference 12-lead ECG system. Phase II evaluated the confidence and reliability in interpretation of ECGs during ergometer (ERG) and on-water (OW) rowing at moderate and high intensities. ECGs were reviewed by two expert readers for HR, rhythm, artifact and confidence in interpretation.
resultsFindings from Phase I found that 91.9% of samples were within the 95% confidence interval for the instantaneous value of the changing exercising HR. The mean correlation coefficient across participants and tests was 0.9886 (σ = 0.0002, SD = 0.017) and between the two systems at elevated HR was 0.9676 (σ = 0.002, SD = 0.05). Findings from Phase II found significant differences for the presence of artifacts and confidence in interpretation in ECGs between readers' for both intensities and testing conditions. Interpretation of ECGs for OW rowing had a lower level of reader agreement than ERG rowing for HR, rhythm, and artifact. Using consensus data between readers' significant differences were apparent between OW and ERG rowing at high-intensity rowing for HR (
conclusionsThe PluxECG device records accurate and reliable HR but not ECG data during exercise in rowers. The quality of ECG tracing derived from the PluxECG device is moderate-low, therefore the confidence in ECG interpretation using the PluxECG device when recorded on open water is inadequate at this time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.