Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36291908›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

TRAIL in the Treatment of Cancer: From Soluble Cytokine to Nanosystems.

Hojjat Alizadeh Zeinabad, Eva Szegezdi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancer: A bioelectric disease?Clinical and translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A review of tanshinone compounds in prostate cancer treatment.Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hojjat Alizadeh ZeinabadApoptosis Research Centre, Biomedical Sciences Building, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, H91 W2TY Galway, Ireland.
Eva SzegezdiApoptosis Research Centre, Biomedical Sciences Building, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Galway, H91 W2TY Galway, Ireland.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEScience Foundation Ireland · IE

Funding

Blood Cancer Network Ireland (BCNI, funded by Science Foundation Ireland and the Irish Cancer Society 14-ICS-B3042DISCOVER-RISE program H2020-RISE-777995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The death ligand tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a member of the TNF cytokine superfamily, has long been recognized for its potential as a cancer therapeutic due to its low toxicity against normal cells. However, its translation into a therapeutic molecule has not been successful to date, due to its short in vivo half-life associated with insufficient tumor accumulation and resistance of tumor cells to TRAIL-induced killing. Nanotechnology has the capacity to offer solutions to these limitations. This review provides a perspective and a critical assessment of the most promising approaches to realize TRAIL's potential as an anticancer therapeutic, including the development of fusion constructs, encapsulation, nanoparticle functionalization and tumor-targeting, and discusses the current challenges and future perspectives.

Indexed as

cancerdeath receptornanoparticlesTRAIL resistancetumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)tumor-targeting

Identifiers

PMID36291908
PMCPMC9600485
OpenAlexW4306837099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.