Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36291872›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Challenges and Learning Curves in Adopting TaTME and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cusum Analysis.

Pere Planellas, Lídia Cornejo, Anna Pigem, Núria Gómez-Romeu, David Julià-Bergkvist, Nuria Ortega, José Ignacio Rodríguez-Hermosa, Ramon Farrés

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pere PlanellasColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
Lídia CornejoGirona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), 17007 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8158-6418
Anna PigemColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
Núria Gómez-RomeuColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
David Julià-BergkvistColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
Nuria OrtegaColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-4494
José Ignacio Rodríguez-HermosaColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
Ramon FarrésColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain.
Universitat de Girona · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New techniques are being developed to improve the results of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. This paper analyzes the learning curves for transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and robot-assisted surgery in our colorectal surgery department. We analyzed retrospectively data from patients undergoing curative and elective surgery for rectal cancer ≤12 cm from the anal verge. We excluded extended surgeries. We used cumulative sum (CUSUM) curve analysis to identify inflection points. Between 2015 and 2021, 588 patients underwent surgery for rectal cancer at our center: 67 taTME and 79 robot-assisted surgeries. To overcome the operative time learning curve, 14 cases were needed for taTME and 53 for robot-assisted surgery. The morbidity rate started to decrease after the 17th case in taTME and after the 49th case in robot-assisted surgery, but it is much less abrupt in robot-assisted group. During the initial learning phase, the rate of anastomotic leakage was higher in taTME (35.7% vs. 5.7%). Two Urological lesions occurred in taTME but not in robot-assisted surgery. The conversion rate was higher in robot-assisted surgery (1.5% vs. 10.1%). Incorporating new techniques is complex and entails a transition period. In our experience, taTME involved a higher rate of serious complications than robot-assisted surgery during initial learning period but required a shorter learning curve.

Indexed as

learning curvesrectal cancerrobotictaTME

Identifiers

PMID36291872
PMCPMC9600114
OpenAlexW4306737638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.